I AM ALPHA AND OMEGA
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:42 pm
Well, I was attending mass yesterday and sure enough, the original version of this passage is read out as one of the readings. Anyhoo, I started thinking (as I tend to do) and was wondering what the writer's intentions were when putting this in Beast Wars.
The thought goes like this:
The Covenant of Primus is very much like any other holy script (the Bible, Koran, Torah, etc.) and clearly in the wrong hands (i.e. the megalomanical kind) it can be used very badly.
So were they using the Covenant of Primus as a point about religious extremism and displaying all the bad things that come with that?
OR
Were they trying to point out that through faith and hope, good will prosper because "everything is as it should be at last"?
OR
Did it just sound cool and having Dave Kaye spout bible quotes just gave that extra level of epicness to it?
Your thoughts?
N.B. This is NOT a religious debate, this is purely about writer perspectives here
The thought goes like this:
The Covenant of Primus is very much like any other holy script (the Bible, Koran, Torah, etc.) and clearly in the wrong hands (i.e. the megalomanical kind) it can be used very badly.
So were they using the Covenant of Primus as a point about religious extremism and displaying all the bad things that come with that?
OR
Were they trying to point out that through faith and hope, good will prosper because "everything is as it should be at last"?
OR
Did it just sound cool and having Dave Kaye spout bible quotes just gave that extra level of epicness to it?

Your thoughts?
N.B. This is NOT a religious debate, this is purely about writer perspectives here
